The Engine and the Road: How Reinforcement and Antecedent Strategies Drive Biology Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71366/ijwos03072617272Keywords:
classroom management strategies, academic achievement, reinforcement, antecedent strategies, science students.
Abstract
Anchored in Skinner’s Operant Conditioning Theory, this study examined how reinforcement, antecedent strategies, teacher-student relationships, and punishment predict the academic achievement of 150 science students and 10 teachers at Ngleshi Amanfrom Senior High School. Using the Behavioural and Instructional Management Scale (BIMS) and standardized achievement tests, multiple regression with clustered robust standard errors revealed that classroom management strategies collectively explained 54.5% of the variance in achievement (R2=.545). Reinforcement emerged as the strongest predictor (β=.562, p<.001), while antecedent strategies contributed a significant 7.7% of unique variance (ΔR2=.077) beyond reinforcement. Interestingly, while teachers prioritized antecedent strategies, students ranked reinforcement highest, suggesting a discrepancy in how management is perceived versus experienced. Furthermore, bivariate analysis showed a link between relational practices and achievement, but multivariate analysis revealed they do not independently predict scores, suggesting relationships act as a proxy for effective instruction. The findings establish reinforcement as the primary driver of success, with antecedents serving as a necessary foundation, while relationships function largely as a proxy for effective management. Consequently, it is concluded that reinforcement is the primary driver of academic success, and it is recommended that teachers prioritise reinforcement and structured antecedent strategies to maximise student achievement.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


